Quality monitoring
Tracking of accuracy signals, exception rates, reviewer corrections and user feedback, with alerts when something moves outside agreed limits.
Managed AI Care Plan · Canada
AI systems change after launch even when your code does not: model providers release new versions, your documents and processes evolve, and usage grows. A managed care plan keeps an eye on quality, cost and security every month, fixes what drifts and keeps improving the system as your team uses it.
Why it matters
A model update can quietly change how an agent follows instructions. A new document layout can lower extraction accuracy. A popular feature can push usage costs up. None of this shows up as an outage, so without monitoring and regular evaluation it goes unnoticed until someone stops trusting the system. A care plan makes someone accountable for catching it early.
What we deliver
Tracking of accuracy signals, exception rates, reviewer corrections and user feedback, with alerts when something moves outside agreed limits.
Your evaluation set is re-run before and after every model, prompt or tool change, so updates are adopted only when they keep or improve quality.
We test new model versions as providers release them and retire old ones before they are withdrawn, so the system keeps working without surprises.
Bug fixes, new document layouts, extra fields, prompt refinements and small workflow changes, prioritized with you each month.
A monthly view of volumes, time saved, model usage and hosting costs, with recommendations to keep running costs in check.
Dependency and library updates, permission and API-key reviews, and checks that logs and data retention still match your policies.
Use cases
Process
We map the workflow with the people who run it, find the highest-value automation points and agree measurable success criteria.
A working prototype on your real data in weeks, not months, tested with real users against the agreed criteria.
Security review, evaluation suite, monitoring, permissions and integration with your systems, ready for production.
We hand over with documentation and training, or stay on to operate, measure and extend the system.
Because the parts around them keep changing. Model providers update and retire models, your documents and processes evolve, and new users ask questions nobody tested. Each can lower quality without causing an obvious failure. Regular monitoring and evaluation catch these changes early, while they are still small fixes.
Monitoring of quality, usage and cost, evaluation re-runs before any model or prompt change, model version updates, bug fixes, small improvements agreed with you, security and access reviews, and a monthly report with a short review call.
As a monthly plan sized to the system: how many workflows it runs, how much it is used and how much change you expect. We quote it at launch, or as part of the AI readiness assessment if you are planning a new build.
Yes. Every build ends with documentation, runbooks and training. Some clients take over fully, some keep the care plan, and some start with the plan and move to their own team once they are comfortable.
Related
Agents that plan, call your tools and APIs, coordinate hand-offs and ask for approval before anything irreversible.
Learn moreAutomate intake, approvals, reconciliations, reporting and the back-office work that still runs on email and spreadsheets.
Learn moreOpen-weight models running in Canadian cloud regions or on your own hardware, for data that can't leave your control.
Learn more8 min read
A practical guide to business process automation in Canada: BPA vs RPA vs AI agents, how to pick processes, human review, rollout steps and honest ROI.
Read the guide7 min read
What drives AI automation and AI agent development cost in Canada: integrations, accuracy, hosting, running costs, payback math and questions for vendors.
Read the guide7 min read
Agentic AI explained for business leaders: how AI agents work, where they succeed and fail, guardrails, evaluation, approvals and examples by department.
Read the guideA 30-minute call is enough to tell whether AI is a fit, what a first project would look like and what it would take to run it in production.